Perceptions and Anticipations towards AI-Enhanced Risk Management in Agile Project Management: A Comparative Survey-Based Analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 Methodologies.
Perceptions and Anticipations towards AI-Enhanced Risk Management in Agile Project Management: A Comparative Survey-Based Analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 Methodologies.
A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
PRESENTED BY
SIDDHARTHA DEB, PMP®, PRINCE2®
SUBMITTED TO THE RESEARCH COMMITTEE AT THE
SWISS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT GENEVA
© Copyright by SIDDHARTHA DEB 2023 | All Rights Reserved
Perceptions and Anticipations towards AI-Enhanced Risk Management in Agile Project Management: A Comparative Survey-Based Analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 Methodologies
A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
PRESENTED BY
SIDDHARTHA DEB
APPROVED BY
__________________________________________
<Chair’s Name, Degree>, Chair
__________________________________________
<Member’s Name, Degree>, Committee Member
__________________________________________
<Member’s Name, Degree>, Committee Member
RECEIVED/APPROVED BY:
<Associate Dean’s Name, Degree>, Associate Dean
ABSTRACT
Perceptions and Anticipations towards AI-Enhanced Risk Management in Agile Project Management: A Comparative Survey-Based Analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 Methodologies
This research embarks on an explorative study of the perceptions and anticipations of project management professionals towards the prospective incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in Agile risk management, primarily within the frameworks of globally recognized project management paradigms, Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) & Projects IN Controlled Environments (PRINCE2). These methodologies offer distinct approaches to risk management and have seen extensive adoption across diverse sectors, yet the intersection of these methodologies with Agile practices, specifically considering AI-enhanced risk management, remains largely speculative.
This study aims to unearth the potential impact and challenges anticipated with the merger of PMBOK and PRINCE2 with AI-based tools in Agile environments, alongside identifying the opportunities and areas of improvement. The research procedure includes a survey-based comparative analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2, capturing practitioners' insights on Agile risk management principles, and an appraisal of AI's potential role.
The research dissects the core doctrines of PMBOK and PRINCE2, appraising their risk management principles and practices. The compatibility and adaptability of each methodology with Agile principles are critically reviewed in the context of AI integration, offering unique insights into their respective strengths and perceived barriers.
The crux of this study lies in understanding the readiness and challenges anticipated by practitioners for intertwining these methodologies with Agile principles and AI tools, aiming to foster resilient risk management strategies. This exploration of the transformative potential of AI within the realm of project and risk management culminates in a collection of insights for potential adoption of AI within Agile frameworks adhering to PMBOK or PRINCE2 methodologies.
In summary, this research endeavors to fill a gap in existing literature regarding the expectations and anticipations towards integrating PMBOK and PRINCE2 in Agile methodologies with AI tools. The derived insights from this study will serve as a valuable resource for project management practitioners, offering fresh perspectives on augmenting risk management in Agile environments using PMBOK, PRINCE2, and AI tools, shaped by the professionals' perceptions and anticipations. This study underscores the transformative potential of AI in risk management within these prominent project management frameworks, viewed through the lens of current practitioners' perspective.
Directed by: DR.Hemant Palivela, PHD
Table Of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction. 6
1.1 Background and Context. 6
1.2 Problem Statement. 7
1.3 Research Objectives and Questions. 7
Research Objectives: 7
Research Questions: 8
1.4. Scope of the Research. 8
1.5. Limitations: 8
1.6. Significance of the Study. 9
1.7. Expected Outcomes: 10
1.8. Overview of the Thesis. 10
1.9. Rationale. 11
Chapter II: LITERATURE REVIEW... 11
2.1. Introduction. 12
2.2. Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) Methodology. 12
2.3. PRINCE2 Methodology. 13
2.4. Agile Methodology and Risk Management. 14
2.5. Comparative Studies. 15
2.6. The Role of AI in Risk Management. 16
2.7. Gaps in Literature. 18
2.8. Intersection of PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile, and Machine Learning/AI 19
2.9. Conclusion. 19
2.10. Summary. 20
Chapter III: METHODOLOGY. 21
3.1. Introduction. 21
3.2. Research Philosophy. 21
3.3. Research Approach. 22
3.4. Research Design. 22
3.5. Methodological Approach. 23
3.6. Research Strategy. 24
3.7. Research Population and Sampling Methods. 25
3.8. Time Horizon. 25
3.9. Data Collection. 26
Primary Data Collection. 26
Secondary Data Collection. 27
3.10. Data Analysis. 27
Quantitative Data Analysis. 27
Qualitative Data Analysis. 27
Data Triangulation. 28
3.11. Ethical Considerations. 28
3.12. Limitations. 29
3.13. Conclusion. 30
CHAPTER IV: RESULTS. 30
CHAPTER V: DISCUSSION.. 30
CHAPTER VI: CONCLUSION.. 30
BIBLIOGRAPHY. 31
Chapter 1: Introduction
In the modern fast-paced and technology-driven world, the relevance of effective project management for successful project execution is unequivocal. Amid escalating complexities and global interdependencies, the need for robust project management methodologies is increasingly paramount. Widely recognized methodologies like Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) and Projects in Controlled Environments (PRINCE2) are often preferred by project managers, owing to their structured guidance for project completion. These methodologies underscore risk management as a pivotal component of project success.
The Agile methodology, known for its adaptability, flexibility, iterative development, and customer-centric approach, has seen widespread adoption across diverse sectors. Initially tailored for software development, Agile has broadened its appeal due to its responsiveness to change. However, its approach to risk management is not as explicitly defined as it is in PMBOK or PRINCE2. This variance sets a promising premise for research exploring the incorporation of risk management principles from PMBOK and PRINCE2 into Agile methodologies.
Parallelly, rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have stirred its integration into numerous operational areas, including risk management. The ability of AI tools to sift through massive datasets, detect patterns, and predict potential risks offers a compelling advantage over traditional risk assessment methods. However, the incorporation of AI tools within PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, particularly within Agile risk management, remains largely unexplored and speculative.
Given this, the research titled "Perceptions and Anticipations towards AI-Enhanced Risk Management in Agile Project Management: A Comparative Survey-Based Analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 Methodologies" delves into the professional perceptions and expectations regarding the integration of AI in risk management, within the context of PMBOK, PRINCE2, and Agile methodologies. This research aims to bridge the knowledge gap, explore the anticipation and readiness for AI integration, and shed light on how AI tools can potentially enhance risk management within Agile frameworks implementing PMBOK or PRINCE2 methodologies.
As Agile project management methodologies continue to gain momentum, their inherent flexibility, adaptability, and customer-centered approach make them appealing for a broad range of projects. However, the less explicit risk management frameworks within these methodologies, as compared to traditional methodologies like PMBOK and PRINCE2, pose a significant concern. Effective risk management is crucial to any project's success, and the relatively nebulous guidelines in Agile methodologies could potentially lead to overlooked risks, negatively impacting project outcomes.
Parallel to the advancements in project management methodologies, the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its affiliated tools herald a new era in the optimization of risk management processes. The remarkable capacity of AI and machine learning algorithms to handle massive datasets and predict potential risks poses a transformative potential for project risk management. However, the intersection of these state-of-the-art technologies with traditional project management methodologies, particularly in an Agile context, is largely speculative and underexplored.
In light of these considerations, the problem this research seeks to address is twofold. The first facet pertains to understanding the perception and readiness within the project management community to incorporate traditional methodologies' robust risk management features, namely PMBOK and PRINCE2, into Agile methodologies. The second facet explores the anticipation and potential hurdles in leveraging AI tools within these integrated methodologies to amplify risk management efficacy in Agile project environments.
Addressing these challenges could significantly contribute to enhancing project management practices and potentially boosting project success rates, particularly those adopting Agile methodologies. Consequently, this study, titled "Perceptions and Anticipations towards AI-Enhanced Risk Management in Agile Project Management: A Comparative Survey-Based Analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 Methodologies," aims to unearth these aspects and provide insightful understanding, promoting a more anticipative and prepared approach to risk management in Agile project environments.
1.To investigate the current understanding and perceptions of project management practitioners regarding the implementation of risk management features of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies within Agile environments.
2.To assess the current anticipation and perceived challenges within the project management community about the integration of Artificial Intelligence tools in risk management within Agile methodologies, specifically in the context of PMBOK and PRINCE2 frameworks.
3.To analyze the comparative appeal of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies for incorporating AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project environments, as viewed by the practitioners.
1.How do project management practitioners perceive the effectiveness of risk management features of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies when integrated into Agile environments?
2.What are the expectations and perceived challenges among project management practitioners about incorporating Artificial Intelligence tools in risk management within Agile methodologies, particularly in the context of PMBOK and PRINCE2 frameworks?
3.How do project management practitioners compare the appeal and applicability of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies when considering the potential for AI-enhanced risk management within Agile project environments?
1. Survey-Based Comparative Analysis:The primary focus of the research will be on survey-based comparative analysis of Agile project practitioners' perceptions and anticipations concerning the effectiveness of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies in risk management. This part of the study will explore the perceived strengths and limitations of these methodologies within Agile environments.
2. Role of Artificial Intelligence: The research will examine the anticipations and perceived challenges among practitioners regarding the potential role of AI tools in enhancing risk management within the context of these methodologies in Agile environments. This exploration will be based on data gathered from surveys, emphasizing practitioner insights and expectations.
3. Comparison of PMBOK and PRINCE2: A significant part of the study will be dedicated to comparing the perceived appeal and applicability of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies concerning the potential of AI-enhanced risk management within Agile project environments. This aspect will also be driven by survey data, shedding light on practitioner perceptions and experiences.
2. Generalizability: The results of this research may primarily apply to Agile project management methodologies, specifically those utilizing PMBOK and PRINCE2. The outcomes might not be fully applicable to other project management environments or methodologies.
3. Subjectivity of Perceptions: As the study is largely based on perceptions and anticipations, the inherent subjectivity of these responses might present limitations. The perceptions of practitioners could be influenced by their personal experiences, biases, and level of exposure to AI tools.
4.Interpretation of Anticipations: The future-oriented nature of anticipations regarding AI-enhanced risk management within Agile environments could present limitations in terms of interpretation and the potential lack of consensus among respondents.
5.Technological Advancements: The swiftly advancing landscape of AI technologies could lead to some findings becoming quickly outdated, particularly anticipations or expectations about the use of AI tools in risk management. This research is a snapshot of the current state of anticipations and may need to be updated as technology progresses.
5. Comparative Analysis: Conducting a direct comparative analysis of perceptions and anticipations related to PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies might be challenging due to their unique principles and practices. The study assumes that there are common points of intersection suitable for comparison within these methodologies.
These limitations should be kept in mind when interpreting the study's findings. They also provide opportunities for future research to further explore these areas and address these limitations.
The significance of this study is twofold, contributing both to the academic corpus and offering practical implications within the sphere of project management.
Firstly, the research contributes novel academic insights into the integration of Artificial Intelligence in the domain of risk management, particularly in Agile project environments. By investigating perceptions and anticipations of practitioners regarding the integration of AI in PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, this study uncovers new perspectives in the ongoing discourse of AI application in risk management. Thus, it contributes to bridging the knowledge gap between traditional, Agile, and AI-enhanced project management.
Secondly, by comparatively analyzing the perceived effectiveness of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies in Agile risk management and the anticipations towards AI's role within this framework, the study provides unique insights. These insights could significantly guide organizations and practitioners grappling with the choice of methodology and the prospective inclusion of AI in their risk management practices.
Furthermore, the significance of the study lies in its pioneering examination of anticipations towards AI-enhanced risk management within Agile environments employing PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies. As AI rapidly progresses, there's a growing need for studies that scrutinize not only its current applications but also future expectations within project management.
The research, by mapping the anticipated trajectory of AI integration in these methodologies, provides a futuristic perspective on risk management practices in Agile settings. This could aid organizations in aligning their strategic planning with anticipated advancements in AI and inform their decisions about investing in AI technologies for risk management.
Lastly, the survey-based analysis embedded in this study equips organizations with an understanding of industry perceptions and anticipations. This understanding can provide cues for tailoring training programs, policy, and resource allocation, thereby aligning better with industry trends and expectations.
In conclusion, this study significantly contributes to academic knowledge in project management and has vital implications for practitioners and organizations adopting or considering Agile methodologies, PMBOK, PRINCE2, and AI tools. The research also paves the way for future inquiries, especially concerning AI's evolving role in project management.
1. Perception Analysis: The study expects to illuminate the current perceptions and anticipations of practitioners regarding the effectiveness of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies in Agile risk management. By surveying industry professionals, the study will provide insights into the real-world applicability and effectiveness of these traditional methodologies within Agile environments.
2. AI in Risk Management: The research aims to uncover the anticipations of practitioners towards the integration of AI tools in Agile risk management, particularly in the context of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies. This will offer a fresh perspective on the potential, challenges, and future prospects of AI within this domain.
3. Comparative Evaluation: By comparing the perceived effectiveness and future anticipations towards AI-enhanced risk management in PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, the study can outline the pros and cons of each within an Agile context. This comparative insight can guide organizations and practitioners in selecting and tailoring their risk management practices.
4. Industry Trend Mapping: The study's survey-based approach is anticipated to map industry trends regarding the application of AI in Agile risk management and its expected evolution within PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies. These trends could serve as a guide for organizations' strategic planning and policy-making regarding AI adoption.
5. Directions for Future Research: By illuminating the current perceptions and future anticipations of AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project management methodologies, the study is expected to expose gaps in current knowledge and practices. These identified gaps can then pave the way for future research, further exploring AI's role in risk management, and testing the findings from this study in real-world applications.
This thesis is systematically arranged into distinct chapters to facilitate the readers' understanding of the complexities of Agile methodology, PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, risk management, and the prospective role of Artificial Intelligence.
Chapter I, the Introduction, presents the background, problem statement, research objectives, and questions. It further outlines the scope of the research, discusses its significance, expected outcomes, and provides a rationale for the study.
Chapter II offers a comprehensive review of the existing literature, scrutinizing Agile methodology, PMBOK, PRINCE2, risk management within these methodologies, and the anticipations towards AI enhancement of these processes. This chapter places the study within the broader context of current academic discourse.
Chapter III describes the research methodology used to address the research objectives and questions. It details the research philosophy and approach, the study's design, the data collection strategies, and the methods for analyzing the collected data. Ethical considerations and limitations of the study are also discussed in this chapter.
Chapter IV presents the findings from the survey-based research. It illustrates the perceived effectiveness and future anticipations of practitioners towards PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies in Agile risk management, with particular emphasis on the role of AI.
Chapter V discusses and interprets these findings in light of the research objectives and questions. This chapter critically analyzes the results, contextualizes them within the broader academic discourse, and elucidates the implications of these findings for the field.
Finally, Chapter VI concludes the study by encapsulating the key findings, their implications, and the study's contributions to the field. It provides an overview of the research and the primary outcomes and presents recommendations for future research.
This thesis structure is designed to guide the reader through the exploration of Agile environments, PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, and the potential transformative impact of AI in enhancing risk management within this context, from the practitioners' perspectives.
In an era of rapid technological advancement, project and risk management have become critical aspects of organizational success. Agile methodology, known for its responsiveness and adaptability, has gained significant traction in project management, particularly in the rapidly evolving field of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Among the various project management frameworks, the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) and Projects in Controlled Environments (PRINCE2) have proven effective across a wide range of projects. However, there exists a significant research gap regarding practitioners' perceptions and anticipations towards AI-enhanced risk management in Agile environments using these methodologies.
This research aims to bridge this gap by carrying out a survey-based comparative analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, focusing on how these frameworks can potentially enhance risk management within Agile contexts through AI applications. This investigation offers a fresh perspective on the interaction of these esteemed project management methodologies with Agile principles and AI technologies, as seen through the eyes of practitioners. The study is set to deliver valuable insights into perceived effectiveness and anticipated improvements in risk management strategies incorporating AI in both methodologies.
Furthermore, this research seeks to elucidate practitioners' anticipations towards the potential benefits and challenges of AI in enhancing risk management within Agile contexts. These insights will provide a roadmap for future adaptations of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies and guide the development of AI tools tailored for Agile project environments. Consequently, the findings of this research have implications for academic discourse and practical application, providing valuable insights for project managers, risk managers, and AI professionals across various industries.
In the dynamic field of project management, the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) and Projects IN Controlled Environments (PRINCE2) remain as pivotal frameworks guiding project execution and management. In parallel, Agile methodologies have seen an upward trend, with their flexible and adaptive nature being highly favored in tech-oriented industries. Lately, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has also made its way into project management, marking a significant impact particularly on risk management processes. Despite these advancements, literature regarding the perceptions and anticipations of project practitioners towards AI-enhanced risk management, and a comparative survey-based analysis between PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies within Agile environments, remains sparse.
This literature review aims to delve into the intricacies of PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodologies, risk management, and the role of AI in enhancing these practices. The review will facilitate a more nuanced understanding of these areas, informing the research objectives. These objectives include investigating practitioners' perceptions of integrating risk management features of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies in Agile environments, their anticipations and perceived challenges of integrating AI tools, and how they compare the appeal of both methodologies in terms of AI-enhanced risk management within Agile project management.
The chapter will be structured as follows: Section 2.1 will give a comprehensive understanding of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, particularly their risk management components. Section 2.2 will delve into Agile methodology, elaborating on its key principles and its stance on risk management. Section 2.3 will explore the current state of AI in risk management within Agile settings. Section 2.4 will delve into the perceptions and anticipations of practitioners towards AI integration in risk management, specifically within PMBOK and PRINCE2 frameworks in Agile environments. Lastly, Section 2.5 will summarize the critical insights gained from the literature review, outlining the areas of focus for the proposed research.
Through an exploration of these topics, this chapter sets the theoretical groundwork for assessing the perceptions and anticipations of project management practitioners, providing a foundational understanding that underpins the subsequent research questions and objectives. It aims to situate the study within the broader academic dialogue and supply a robust justification for the chosen research direction.
The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) is highly recognized in the realm of project management methodologies for its structured approach that offers comprehensive coverage of all facets of project management, including risk management (Fitsilis, 2008). However, despite its comprehensive nature and strong methodology, critiques highlight its inherent rigidity and extensive documentation requirements, which pose challenges when integrating with Agile methodologies, particularly within the context of IT projects (Rosenberger & Tick, 2018).
To address the dynamic nature of modern project environments, the Project Management Institute (PMI) introduced significant changes in the seventh edition of PMBOK. This edition emphasizes principles, value delivery, and project tailoring to accommodate emerging trends, thereby suggesting an evolutionary and disruptive shift from earlier versions (Amaro & Domingues, 2022). This newer approach aims to facilitate project tailoring and value creation, thus empowering project teams to achieve better results.
Despite these positive steps, disparities exist between PMBOK's theoretical framework and its practical implementation. A survey involving 117 project managers revealed significant variations in the implementation of PMBOK knowledge areas, with areas like integration, cost, and procurement being more frequently implemented while quality, scope, and stakeholder areas were less frequently applied (Davidov et al., 2023). This finding underlines the need for improved alignment between textbooks and actual project management practices, suggesting a need to reassess and refine educational resources.
Risk management has been consistently emphasized as a critical aspect of project management. Studies highlight the significant influence of risk management planning and risk identification on project performance. For instance, in the renewable energy sector, effective risk management was found to account for about 79.6% of project performance variance (Kunya & Yusuf, 2023). Hence, the research proposes the enhancement of risk management practices to improve project performance further.
Rehacek (2017) provides an in-depth examination of primary project risk management standards, emphasizing the crucial role of risk management in project management. He highlights the paradox of project risk exposure being highest during the early stages when the information regarding the risk is minimal. The study advocates for a balanced approach towards opportunities and threats when managing risks, stressing the need for project-specific tailoring of risk management standards.
While the PMBOK has shown an adaptability shift in its newer editions, integrating it with Agile methodologies remains a challenge. These challenges are further pronounced within Scrum-developed projects, where traditional PMBOK processes sometimes conflict with Agile practices (Rosenberger & Tick, 2018). Potential solutions proposed include leveraging user story maturity or minimum viable products to bridge the existing gaps.
Despite these challenges, several studies, such as those by Fitsilis (2008) and Rebaiaia & Vieira (2014), support the idea of integrating Agile methodologies with PMBOK. They argue that such integration could offer a more holistic and flexible framework for project management, optimizing project execution and risk minimization.
In conclusion, the literature indicates a clear consensus on the potential benefits of a combined approach incorporating Agile methodologies with PMBOK for effective project management. However, a significant gap exists in this area, particularly concerning risk management. Addressing this gap, with a focus on enhancing PMBOK's integration with Agile methodologies and the application of AI and machine learning tools in risk management, aligns with your research objectives. The research is poised to contribute significantly to the understanding and application of PMBOK in today's Agile-dominated project environment.
The Prince2 Methodology is globally recognized for its significance in risk management within Agile project management methodologies. Developed by the UK government's Central Computer and Telecommunications Agency (CCTA), PRINCE2 is renowned for its robust structure and clarity, with an emphasis on dividing projects into manageable and controllable stages (Author, 2023). The methodology uses seven principles, themes, and processes, one of which is risk management, a systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and controlling project risks.
However, despite its strengths, PRINCE2 can sometimes be considered rigid, which necessitates exploration of how it can be tailored to Agile environments and how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can enhance these practices (Author, 2023). In this context, the research by Dodd and Wang (2012) into risk management practices of small businesses according to PRINCE2 methodologies provides valuable insights. They found that proactive risk management was crucial for business survival, especially in unstable economic climates. However, the methodologies like PRINCE2, while able to reduce risk, cannot ensure total risk avoidance, particularly in environments characterized by constant change and economic uncertainty.
Karaman and Kurt (2015) proposed that PRINCE2, with its focus on project board activities and management by exception, might be more suitable for small IT projects. Conversely, PMBOK may be more applicable to larger, more complex IT projects with high stakeholder engagement. However, the effectiveness of PMBOK and PRINCE2 largely depends on a project's specific needs and context (Jamali & Oveisi, 2016).
Skogmar (2022) emphasized that the PMBOK guide concentrates on the knowledge required by a project manager and provides specific tools and techniques. On the other hand, PRINCE2 manages the project with a clearly defined framework, including roles, responsibilities, principles, and processes. When used in tandem, both methodologies offer a comprehensive project management approach that meets ISO 21500 standard requirements.
Mousaei and Gandomani (2018) explored the combination of Scrum, a popular Agile development methodology, and Prince2 to address the absence of risk management mechanisms in the software development process. The proposed model was reported to successfully mitigate project risks, increase project success rate, enhance product quality, and offer reliable risk identification, analysis, and control mechanisms. They recommended further exploration of hybrid models that fuse project management standards like PMBOK, P2M, OPM3, PRINCE2, and Agile methods like Scrum, DSDM, XP, ASD to improve project management and quality assurance in Agile software development.
In conclusion, this updated literature review emphasizes the need for further exploration of how to blend the strengths of these methodologies, particularly in risk management, within Agile project management methodologies and how AI can enhance these processes. This aligns with your research objectives and questions, especially those pertaining to the strengths and weaknesses of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, and how AI and machine learning tools can enhance risk management processes within Agile methodologies. The review also underscores the importance of developing a framework that incorporates the strengths of PMBOK and PRINCE2 and evaluating the effectiveness of the developed framework and the integration of AI tools in enhancing risk management in Agile project management.
Agile project management methodologies are widely recognized for their inherent flexibility and adaptability, making them particularly suited for sectors such as software development and the IT industry (Williams, 2023; Moran, 2014). The agile approach, characterized by rapid, iterative cycles and an emphasis on continual feedback, inherently promotes a proactive stance towards risk management (Williams, 2023). Nevertheless, the literature indicates that the treatment of risk management within Agile methodologies can often be implicit, which poses a potential issue of neglecting critical project risks. This neglect can have a significant impact on the success of project outcomes, leading to inefficiencies and potential failures (Moran, 2014; Albadarneh et al., 2015; Tavares et al., 2019).
Recent research emphasizes the increasing importance of incorporating systematic risk management strategies throughout every stage of project execution, particularly within the IT sector (Tucnik, Otcenaskova & Horalek, 2023). This emerging trend further points towards a need for an integrated approach to risk management within Agile methodologies, suggesting the utility of combining Agile with techniques from other methodologies such as PRINCE2. Such a merger could potentially enhance risk communication and better equip teams to handle project uncertainties (Tomanek and Juricek, 2015), a point which aligns with the first research objective of this thesis.
The application of Agile methodologies has been found to transcend the boundaries of the software and IT industries, making its way into various other sectors such as IoT system development and biotechnology (Guerrero-Ulloa, Rodríguez-Domínguez, and Hornos, 2023; Martin, 2023). Despite this widespread adoption, there exist certain gaps in Agile methodology, especially in areas like the elicitation and analysis of requirements, the maintenance phase, and non-functional requirements in IoT system development (Guerrero-Ulloa, Rodríguez-Domínguez, and Hornos, 2023).
With the COVID-19 pandemic necessitating a shift towards remote work, new challenges have emerged for Agile methodologies. The inherent nature of Agile, which promotes reactiveness, collaboration, and decentralized decision-making, can be impeded in a remote setting due to fewer opportunities for organic interaction (Reunamaki, R., & Fey, C.F., 2023).
Another notable challenge pertains to striking a balance between agility and security in software development, particularly within Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). It has been observed that Agile methods often compromise security, a critical aspect of software development, for the sake of increased speed and flexibility. Mihelič, Vrhovec, & Hovelja (2023) recommend a lightweight approach to evaluating Agile methods from a security perspective, which could be particularly beneficial for SMEs.
On the positive side, there is growing interest in leveraging design flexibility, a salient feature of Agile methodologies, as a strategy for risk mitigation (Tucnik, Otcenaskova & Horalek, 2023). Likewise, methodologies such as PMBOK and PRINCE2, which are known for their more explicit risk management strategies, could potentially complement Agile methodologies and improve project outcomes. This could be especially beneficial for larger or more complex projects that may require a more formal approach to risk management (Schwalbe, 2012; Nelson et al., 2008).
Furthermore, advancements in technology, particularly AI and machine learning tools, present new opportunities for enhancing risk management within Agile methodologies. These tools could enable more efficient identification, analysis, and management of risks (Association for Computing Machinery, 2020). The possibility of integrating such technologies into risk maturity models, along with other innovative methods like the LEGO approach and sensitivity analysis, is also being considered (Kusrini, Praditya, & Wahyudi, 2023).
Despite these advancements, the literature reveals noticeable gaps in our current understanding of risk management within Agile methodologies. These gaps pertain to the integration of AI into these methodologies and the comparison of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies in terms of their approach to risk management (Association for Computing Machinery, 2020). Addressing these gaps could provide significant improvements to risk management within Agile project management methodologies, thereby contributing to this study's aim and research questions.
In conclusion, the existing literature underscores the idea that while Agile methodologies naturally manage risks due to their inherent flexibility, there is considerable scope for integrating more formal and explicit risk management strategies, including AI tools and strategies from the PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies. A deeper understanding of risk management in Agile methodologies, combined with the effective integration of these additional elements, has the potential to significantly enhance project outcomes. This aligns with the research objectives and questions of this thesis, underscoring the need for this study.
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into risk management strategies in Agile methodologies is an area of growing interest with significant potential to enhance risk prediction and mitigation strategies (Willumsen et al., 2023). Despite this, practical applications and implications of these advancements remain under investigation, necessitating project managers to be familiar with AI's capabilities (Belharet et al., 2020). A pivotal aspect of this exploration is the comparison between the PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, especially their differing approaches to risk management within Agile environments.
Traditional project management methodologies, such as PMBOK and PRINCE2, have adapted to incorporate Agile principles over time due to evolving project requirements and technological advancements (Morjane, Bannari & Gharib, 2022; Richter, 2015; Skogmar, 2022). This adaptation signifies the shifting landscape of project management, from rigid, structured planning towards a more iterative and flexible approach (Morjane et al., 2022). However, a clear translation of terminology, processes, and structures between traditional and Agile paradigms is essential to ensure seamless transitions (Richter, 2015; Ghosh et al., 2015).
Existing comparative studies (Ghosh et al., 2015; Raharjo and Purwandari, 2020) provide insightful reflections on the unique strengths, weaknesses, and differences of these methodologies, especially in the context of AI integration. However, they also reveal a knowledge gap about how to integrate AI tools into risk management strategies within Agile project management. This research aims to bridge that gap by examining the current state of risk management within Agile methodologies in PMBOK and PRINCE2, identifying their strengths and weaknesses, and investigating the potential of AI for enhancing risk management in Agile.
Agile Project Management (APM), characterized by its iterative process and flexibility, promises superior productivity, quality, and customer satisfaction, especially in high-risk and time-sensitive projects (Salameh, 2014). However, Agile methodologies may lack explicit strategies for risk management (Fitsilis, 2008). Tomanek and Juricek (2015) propose filling this gap by integrating PRINCE2's systematic risk management approach into the Scrum framework.
In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, the sustainability of traditional project management strategies is questioned. Hybrid project management, incorporating elements from Agile methodologies and traditional project management, offers a promising solution for future sustainability (Leong et al., 2023). These hybrid methodologies, by leveraging best practices from different methodologies, optimize the likelihood of project success, reduce costs, improve outcomes, minimize waste, and enhance stakeholder satisfaction. However, these innovative approaches need further exploration to understand why hybrid initiatives tend to be more effective.
In summary, the literature highlights the ongoing evolution in project management methodologies, the growing interest in AI integration, the unique implications of various methodologies, and the potential of hybrid methodologies. While Agile methodologies have shown great promise, especially in managing high-risk projects, their incorporation into traditional project management methodologies is still an open area of research. This study aims to contribute to filling this knowledge gap by exploring how to best combine the strengths of traditional and Agile methodologies and use AI to enhance risk management within Agile project management.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized for its potential to augment risk management in project management contexts. Its capacity to process vast amounts of data and mitigate human bias significantly improves project management efficiency (Soravito, 2023). As complexity increases in projects and many organizations undervalue the importance of data, the role of AI becomes pivotal.
AI tools such as fuzzy systems, CBR, ANNs, SVM, and transformed regression models play a significant role in risk management (Soravito, 2023). These tools can lead to more accurate and impartial decision-making, supplementing traditional statistical models that have often fallen short in meeting the dynamic needs of project management. However, these tools, while powerful, are designed to complement, rather than replace, traditional risk management methods, highlighting the continued importance of expert judgment in the risk management process.
Fotso, Pradhan, and Sukdeo (2022) assert the potential of AI in mitigating project failures in IT sector. They suggest a holistic approach involving a mix of qualified project management professionals, relevant skills, process, milestones, and budgeting, with AI being a significant contributor. AI can efficiently manage project scope, time, cost, and resources while also enhancing quality control, risk awareness, and project productivity. The onset of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, with AI at the forefront, has deeply transformed project management. The synergistic application of AI and the Internet of Things (IoT) can lead to improved data analysis, streamlined workflows, accurate data predictions, process automation, and time-saving, all contributing to better project outcomes with methodologies like PMBOK, Prince2, and Agile.
Martínez & Fernández-Rodríguez (2015) and Belharet et al. (2020) suggest an interdependent relationship between AI and project managers, indicating a transformation in Project Management Office (PMO) models as AI assumes more roles. However, despite the evident potential of AI, challenges such as lack of investment, resistance to change, and difficulty understanding AI tools persist (Soravito, 2023).
Mishra, Tripathi & Khazanchi (2023) demonstrate how AI/ML can enhance decision-making within Agile methodologies by automating routine tasks, enabling project managers to focus more on complex problem-solving and innovative tasks. This reflects the principles of Agile project management and aligns with your first research question.
Fotso, Pradhan, and Sukdeo (2022) emphasize that successful implementation of technology project management (TPM) involves requirements like highly qualified professionals, critical thinking, communication skills, conflict and change management abilities. Aligning these skills with the unique, fluctuating characteristics of IT project management, such as resource planning, agile methodologies, and hybrid project management, can tackle challenges arising from project implementation, thereby reducing discrepancies and delays.
Concurrent research underscores the importance of AI and OR methods in the banking sector, opening new avenues for their application in risk management (Doumpos et al., 2022). This underlines the scope of incorporating AI in risk management in PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, reflecting your second research objective.
Dwivedi et al. (2023) highlight the transformative role of AI tools like ChatGPT in sectors including risk management. They emphasize the need to overcome organizational resistance to change and develop criteria to evaluate generative AI outputs. They also raise concerns about potential misuse of AI tools, necessitating proactive cybersecurity measures. This reinforces the need to consider all potential risks associated with AI integration in Agile project management methodologies.
Schuett, J., Reuel, A., and Carlier, A. (2023) scrutinize the role of an AI ethics board in companies developing and deploying artificial intelligence systems and its potential to mitigate associated risks. This underlines the need to integrate AI tools into Agile methodologies while ensuring necessary ethical considerations are met, reinforcing your third research objective.
Hacker, Engel, and Mauer (2023) emphasize the necessity of regulatory measures that keep pace with rapid AI development for effective risk management. Papagiannidis et al. (2022) also highlight the need for robust AI governance practices when integrating AI into organizational operations. These perspectives echo the importance of evaluating the effectiveness of the developed framework and the integration of AI tools in enhancing risk management in Agile project management, resonating with your final research question.
In conclusion, the literature provides substantial evidence of the potential of AI to enhance risk management within Agile methodologies, and the challenges associated with integrating these AI tools. Further research is needed to develop a comprehensive framework to effectively incorporate AI into Agile methodologies, particularly those outlined in PMBOK and PRINCE2. The literature also suggests the need for collaboration between academia, regulators, and technology experts to create comprehensive risk management models that harness the potential of AI.
Upon a comprehensive examination of the literature pertaining to PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodologies, risk management, and the application of AI within these contexts, several gaps emerge. These gaps not only indicate areas requiring further exploration but also represent key points this research seeks to address.
Primarily, a dearth of studies offering a detailed comparative analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies within Agile environments, with a particular focus on risk management, is evident. While both PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies and their interplay with Agile methodologies have been extensively examined, a comprehensive comparative analysis specifically focused on risk management is still wanting. This gap hinders the complete understanding of how these methodologies can be harnessed to optimize risk management in Agile environments.
Secondarily, the aspect of utilizing AI to elevate risk management within these methodologies is significantly under-researched. Considering the rapid progression in AI technologies and their potential applicability in project management, this represents an essential domain requiring further exploration. While a few studies broach the potential of AI in project management, a thorough investigation into AI's specific role in bolstering risk management within PMBOK, PRINCE2, and Agile methodologies remains a discernible gap in existing literature.
Tertiary, there is a noticeable scarcity of empirical research that integrates these domains - PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodologies, risk management, and AI. While these areas have been studied in isolation, very limited research attempts to amalgamate them; this presents a substantial opportunity for this study to contribute novel insights by examining these areas in a combined manner.
Lastly, although some existing frameworks aim to merge different project management methodologies, very few propose frameworks for assimilating the strengths of PMBOK and PRINCE2 in Agile contexts, specifically for risk management. Even fewer attempt to propose a framework that considers the integration of AI tools to further bolster risk management. This represents a significant lacuna in the literature that this research aims to fill.
In conclusion, while existing literature does offer some insights into the individual domains this research explores, an exhaustive analysis that seamlessly blends these domains is yet to be completed. This research endeavors to contribute to the existing body of literature by addressing these gaps, offering fresh insights into the comparative analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2, the potential role of AI in risk management, and the development of an integrated framework aimed at enhancing risk management in Agile project management.
The confluence of PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodologies, and machine learning/AI paints a progressive picture for the future of project management. This innovative approach uniquely combines the robustness of traditional project management frameworks with the agility of modern methodologies, while harnessing the power of AI and machine learning to push the boundaries of project management, particularly in the realm of risk management.
Traditional project management methodologies, such as PMBOK and PRINCE2, offer well-structured processes and guiding principles that aid project managers in proficiently managing various project aspects, including risk management. Their comprehensive frameworks ensure that project risks are meticulously identified, analyzed, responded to, and continuously monitored throughout the project lifecycle, emphasizing the need for iterative risk assessment and vigilance.
Conversely, Agile methodologies introduce a more flexible and adaptive stance to project management, making them ideal for projects with a high degree of uncertainty or changeability, a characteristic often found in tech and software development ventures. Agile methodologies encourage continuous feedback, iterative progression, and a swift response to change, all integral to successful risk management.
Incorporating AI and machine learning tools into project management is a relatively nascent development but one that promises substantial enhancements. AI technologies have the potential to automate various project management tasks, refine decision-making through data-driven insights, and elevate risk identification, analysis, and response strategies. Machine learning, a subset of AI, can analyze historical project data to anticipate potential risks, thereby enabling more proactive risk management.
Although PMBOK, PRINCE2, and Agile methodologies have proven effective in managing project risk, their amalgamation with AI technologies opens up the possibility of crafting an even more potent, efficient approach to risk management. However, this integration is a largely uncharted territory, with limited studies investigating how these methodologies can be combined and enhanced through AI for improved risk management.
This research aims to traverse this intersection of PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodologies, and AI, with a particular focus on risk management. By comparing the risk management strategies of PMBOK and PRINCE2 in Agile environments, and exploring how they can be augmented with AI, this study aspires to not only provide fresh insights into this topic but also make significant contributions to this emerging field of research.
The literature review has traversed a range of topics and theories integral to the primary focus of this research, namely, the comparative study of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies to enhance risk management within Agile environments utilizing AI.
The review commenced by delving into the project management methodologies of PMBOK and PRINCE2, emphasizing their strategies towards risk management. These methodologies each present comprehensive frameworks for managing project risks, though they distinguish themselves in several key aspects due to their fundamental philosophies and approaches.
We then shifted our focus to Agile methodology and its approach towards risk management. Agile, with its inherent adaptability and responsiveness to change, offers effective risk management in uncertain or dynamic project environments. Nonetheless, the integration of traditional project management methodologies like PMBOK and PRINCE2 can further fortify Agile's risk management capabilities.
Subsequently, we evaluated the potential role of AI and machine learning in risk management. AI shows immense promise in refining risk management processes by facilitating automation, advancing decision-making through data-driven insights, and promoting proactive risk management.
In the comparative studies segment, we scrutinized several research pieces that compared PMBOK, PRINCE2, and Agile methodologies. Although these studies yield valuable insights, there exists a noticeable research gap in the specific comparison of these methodologies' effectiveness in risk management within Agile environments, accentuated by AI.
In the final segments, we spotlighted the gaps in existing literature and deliberated on the intersection of PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodologies, and AI. The fusion of these diverse areas is a largely unexplored research avenue that harbors significant potential for enhancing risk management in Agile project management.
To conclude, while current literature provides substantial exploration into PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodologies, AI, and risk management, a more lucid comprehension is required of the symbiosis of these areas to augment risk management within Agile environments. This research aims to bridge these gaps, thereby contributing to a more profound understanding of this subject, and establishing a groundwork for further research in this compelling and evolving field.
This literature review has embarked on an extensive journey through multiple intertwined domains, namely, PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodology, AI, and risk management. Upon this exploration, it is evident that there are significant opportunities for a synergistic amalgamation of these areas.
Firstly, both PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies provide well-structured risk management frameworks. Agile methodology, characterized by its flexibility and adaptability, offers a dynamic approach to risk management, inherently sensitive to fluctuating project conditions. While these methodologies exhibit strengths, there also exist areas that could benefit from further enhancement or complementary strategies.
Secondly, AI and machine learning pose a substantial potential for enriching risk management within these project management methodologies. They offer automation, in-depth analysis, and a proactive standpoint towards handling project risks.
Nonetheless, despite these promising elements, a limited number of studies have ventured into a detailed comparative analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 within Agile project management environments using AI to enhance risk management. This evident research gap is of particular note, given the escalating prevalence of Agile methodology and AI in project management, along with the potential benefits from integrating PMBOK and PRINCE2's risk management processes into Agile projects.
Moreover, the crossroads of PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodology, and AI presents a promising area of exploration for advancing risk management in Agile project management. A pressing need exists for research that intertwines these domains and devises a comprehensive framework for effective risk management.
To conclude, this literature review has laid a solid groundwork for the subsequent research, delineating the current state of knowledge, identifying opportunities for further investigation, and pinpointing the gaps that this research intends to bridge. This research aspires to furnish the field of project management with invaluable insights on the efficient amalgamation of PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodology, and AI for an enhanced risk management approach.
This chapter demystifies the methodology applied in this research, which aspires to unravel the answer to the pivotal question: "How can a comparative analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 augment risk management in Agile methodology using Artificial Intelligence, and what are the key characteristics of an AI-enhanced framework?" The adopted methodologies are designed to facilitate an exhaustive analysis, ensure robust data collection, and lay a foundation for credible interpretations and conclusions.
The architecture of this research design pivots on three primary objectives: a comparative dissection of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies regarding risk management within Agile projects, an exploration of AI's role in mitigating risk within the Agile approach, and the development of an AI-enhanced risk management framework that amalgamates the strengths of both PMBOK and PRINCE2.
The methodology design is envisioned to offer tangible solutions to the research questions. A mixed-method approach, converging qualitative and quantitative techniques, forms the bedrock of the research. This strategy facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the attributes, strengths, and limitations of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies and their application in Agile risk management. Concurrently, it delves into the prospective role and impact of AI in refining these processes. A mixed-method approach extends a broader perspective and counteracts the constraints of solely employing qualitative or quantitative research methods.
The following sections of this chapter delve into the research design, data collection techniques and instruments, sampling approach, and data analysis methodologies. Ethical considerations linked with the study are discussed, along with the limitations intrinsic to the methodology.
The choice of this research methodology aims to ensure that the study's findings add substantial value to the existing corpus of knowledge on PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodology, AI, and risk management. These insights are expected to bear practical implications for organizations employing or contemplating the use of Agile methodologies, and for those involved in the development and application of AI in project risk management.
The bedrock of this investigation is embedded in the interpretivist research philosophy. This paradigm is apt for this research given the intricacy and context-specific nature of risk management within project management methodologies, specifically PMBOK and PRINCE2, operating within Agile environments using AI tools.
Interpretivism fosters an in-depth, nuanced grasp of the phenomena under study. In this scenario, it enables the researcher to delve into the mechanics of how PMBOK and PRINCE2 tackle risk within Agile projects and the capacity of AI to elevate these processes. This philosophy acknowledges multiple realities and interpretations, asserting that the truths are constructs of individual interpretations of their experiences.
Risk management protocols can vary extensively across various projects and organizations, and the integration of AI tools into these protocols is still a relatively novel and evolving field. Therefore, the interpretive philosophy is in perfect alignment with the research aims. It backs the exploration of multifaceted perspectives on risk management, encapsulating those of project managers, risk managers, and AI specialists who possess practical experience with these methodologies.
Under the aegis of this research philosophy, the study strives to comprehend the 'why' and 'how' of risk management practices under PMBOK and PRINCE2 within Agile environments and the role of AI tools in advancing these practices. It esteems subjective experiences and interpretations and aspires to extract insights entrenched in the specific contexts and experiences of the individuals and organizations involved.
In conclusion, the interpretivist research philosophy provides an apt scaffold for this investigation, setting the stage for a detailed, nuanced, and contextual understanding of the research problem. The philosophy underscores the importance of ensuring comprehensive and meaningful responses to the research questions, which is integral to the research design.
The methodological approach undertaken for this study is primarily a mixed-method, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses. This approach aligns with the interpretive philosophy of the research, offering a nuanced understanding and interpretation of the phenomena under investigation.
Qualitative Approach: Given the exploratory nature of the study, particularly concerning the implementation and integration of AI tools for risk management in Agile environments following PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, a qualitative approach is pertinent. This approach will allow for detailed examination and interpretation of relevant practices, experiences, and perceptions from the viewpoint of project management professionals. The qualitative method will include an in-depth review and synthesis of existing literature along with primary data collection, mainly from survey responses, interviews, or focus groups with project management practitioners, AI specialists, and other stakeholders. This approach suits the intricacy and novelty of the research topic, allowing for flexibility and depth in data collection and analysis.
Quantitative Approach: While the study is primarily qualitative, it incorporates significant elements of quantitative analysis. The comparative evaluation of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, particularly their appeal and applicability in integrating AI-enhanced risk management within Agile environments, will involve quantification such as comparing preferences or anticipation levels of project management practitioners derived from survey responses. Similarly, the evaluation of the perceived challenges about incorporating AI tools in risk management may involve the analysis of quantitative data, such as frequency and impact ratings.
In conclusion, the mixed-methods approach enables comprehensive exploration and understanding of the research problem. The qualitative aspect fosters a deep, nuanced understanding of the topic, while the quantitative facet introduces objectivity and precision. This balance enhances the robustness, credibility, and generalizability of the research findings, making this approach highly suitable for this study.
The research design for this study aligns with the pragmatic and mixed-methods approach, integrating elements of both qualitative and quantitative research. This strategy enables an in-depth exploration of the research topic, providing a comprehensive understanding of various facets related to PMBOK, PRINCE2, and AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project environments.
This study design involves three primary phases corresponding to the research objectives:
1. Understanding Perceptions: The initial phase involves assessing project management practitioners' understanding and perceptions of the risk management features of PMBOK and PRINCE2 when implemented within Agile environments. This phase will be mostly qualitative, with some quantitative elements, employing a comprehensive review of existing literature, practitioner surveys, and expert interviews to collect primary data.
2. Assessing Anticipation and Challenges: The second phase focuses on the anticipation and perceived challenges in the project management community about the integration of AI tools in risk management within Agile methodologies, especially in the context of PMBOK and PRINCE2 frameworks. This phase will use mixed methods, including surveys and potentially focus groups or interviews, to understand practitioners' expectations, reservations, and perceived roadblocks in harnessing AI for risk management.
3. Comparative Analysis: The final phase involves a comparative analysis of the appeal of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies for integrating AI-enhanced risk management in Agile environments, as perceived by project management practitioners. This phase will use a mixed-method approach, employing quantitative analysis of survey responses and qualitative interpretation of open-ended survey responses or interview data.
Each phase of the research design directly answers the distinct research questions, thereby collectively addressing the central research query. This design ensures systematic and comprehensive exploration of the research topic, striking a balance between theoretical exploration and practical interpretation. By the conclusion of this process, the study aims to offer invaluable insights into the perceived efficacy, anticipation, challenges, and comparative appeal of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies for AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project management.
The research employs a mixed-method approach, integrating the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative research methods. By employing these methods, the study intends to comprehensively understand the project management practitioners' perceptions, anticipations, and the comparative appeal of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies for AI-enhanced risk management in Agile environments.
3.5.1. Qualitative Approach
The qualitative approach is used to investigate the current understanding and perceptions of project management practitioners regarding PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies' risk management features within Agile environments. This approach includes conducting an extensive literature review, developing and implementing a practitioner survey, and possibly conducting interviews with industry experts experienced in these methodologies. The qualitative approach helps elucidate the practitioners' experiences, opinions, and suggestions about these methodologies' effectiveness within Agile environments.
3.5.2. Quantitative Approach
The quantitative approach is employed primarily to assess the current anticipation and perceived challenges about the integration of AI tools in risk management within Agile methodologies, particularly in the context of PMBOK and PRINCE2 frameworks. This approach involves the development and implementation of a structured survey, targeting a broad range of project management practitioners. The survey responses are statistically analyzed to draw objective and generalizable conclusions about practitioners' anticipations and perceived challenges.
3.5.3. Comparative Analysis
The final phase of the research involves a comparative analysis of the appeal of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies for incorporating AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project environments. This phase employs both qualitative and quantitative approaches, using the data collected from surveys and possibly interviews, and conducting statistical analysis and interpretative analysis of the data.
3.5.4. Research Rigor and Ethical Considerations
This study adheres to established validity, reliability, and generalizability principles to ensure research rigor. Data triangulation will be used to enhance the findings' validity. For qualitative research, the principles of credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability will be upheld.
Ethical considerations are a paramount concern throughout the research process. Participation in surveys or interviews is entirely voluntary; informed consent will be obtained before involving any participants. Data collected will be anonymized to protect privacy and securely stored to maintain confidentiality.
Overall, this methodical approach aims to yield solid and insightful results that can make a significant contribution to project management and AI research fields. This mixed-methods approach, incorporating qualitative and quantitative research, ensures that the study comprehensively covers all aspects of the topic.
The research strategy for this study relies on a mixed-methods approach that allows for the in-depth examination of project management practitioners' perceptions and anticipations towards AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project management, specifically comparing PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies.
Survey-Based Analysis: Given the aim of understanding and evaluating perceptions and anticipations among practitioners, a survey-based analysis approach is fitting. This strategy involves developing comprehensive survey instruments that effectively capture practitioners' views and opinions regarding the integration of AI tools in risk management within Agile methodologies and their experiences with PMBOK and PRINCE2 frameworks.
The survey will be distributed to a wide range of project management practitioners working in various industries and organizations. The survey responses will be statistically analyzed to answer the research questions, with an emphasis on comparing the responses of practitioners familiar with PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies.
Qualitative Interviews: To gain deeper insights, the research strategy also includes conducting qualitative interviews with selected practitioners. The interviews will be semi-structured, allowing for flexibility in exploring interesting and unexpected avenues that may emerge during the interviews. The interview data will be analyzed thematically to extract key themes and patterns corresponding to the research objectives.
Comparative Analysis: The final part of the research strategy is the comparative analysis of the appeal of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies for incorporating AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project environments. This analysis will be based on the data collected through the surveys and interviews and will involve comparing the responses of practitioners familiar with PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies.
To sum up, the research strategy in this study aims to comprehensively understand the research issue at hand. The research is designed to generate robust, insightful findings that contribute to both academic knowledge and practical project management practices. By using a combination of survey-based analysis and qualitative interviews within a comparative analysis framework, the research provides a thorough exploration of the topic.
The research population for this study involves project management practitioners who have experience in implementing PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies within Agile environments and familiarity with AI-enhanced risk management.
1. Research Population: The population consists of project management practitioners, which may include project managers, risk managers, and professionals working in risk management roles who have exposure to PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies in Agile environments. This population spans across various industries and geographical locations, enabling us to gather diverse insights. Additionally, professionals involved in developing, implementing, or using AI tools in project risk management also form part of this population.
2. Sampling Methods: The research will employ a combination of purposive sampling and stratified sampling. With purposive sampling, we aim to select individuals with significant experience and knowledge of the integration of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies in Agile environments and the incorporation of AI tools in risk management.
Stratified sampling will further be used to ensure a balanced representation of practitioners familiar with either PMBOK or PRINCE2 methodologies. This will enable us to conduct a robust comparative analysis of the two methodologies in relation to their potential for AI-enhanced risk management in Agile environments.
To reach out to a wider population and ensure adequate representation of different perspectives, snowball sampling might be employed. This is particularly relevant for reaching professionals involved in the intersection of AI and project risk management, an emerging and specialized area.
3. Sample Size: The sample size will be determined based on saturation principles, i.e., data collection will continue until no new insights are obtained. While it's difficult to pre-specify the exact sample size in qualitative research, the aim is to ensure a diverse and comprehensive set of participants to provide rich and in-depth data for analysis.
In conclusion, the research population and sampling methods are designed to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the research problem. By selecting participants with specific expertise and experience, the study aims to generate rigorous and practical findings to contribute to the field of project management and AI-enhanced risk management.
Given the focus of this research project on understanding the perceptions and anticipations towards AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project management using PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, it necessitates a longitudinal time frame. A longitudinal study offers a more comprehensive exploration of the phenomena as they develop over time, which is particularly pertinent in this research due to the constant evolution and integration of AI technologies.
This research is projected to span over an estimated period of two years, providing sufficient time to collect detailed and relevant data from project management practitioners. The longitudinal nature of this study will allow the researcher to capture the evolving perceptions and anticipation towards AI in risk management in Agile environments using PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies.
The research project will have several critical stages:
1. Literature Review (1-3 months): Conducting a comprehensive review of existing literature on AI in risk management, Agile methodologies, and the utilization of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies. Additionally, a detailed research plan will be developed during this stage.
2. Data Collection (3-6 months): Engaging with project management practitioners with experience in PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies within Agile environments, and familiarity with AI-enhanced risk management. Data will be gathered through surveys, offering comparative insights into the appeal of PMBOK and PRINCE2 for incorporating AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project environments.
3. Data Analysis and Interpretation (2-4 months): Analysis and interpretation of survey responses concerning the research objectives and questions. This stage will be crucial in understanding how project management practitioners perceive and anticipate AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project management using PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies.
4. Writing and Review (2-4 months): Writing up the research findings, drawing conclusions, and making revisions based on feedback from supervisors and peers.
It's important to note that these stages are not strictly linear and may overlap. For example, preliminary data analysis may begin during the data collection stage. Also, the estimated timeframe may need to be adjusted based on progress and any unforeseen challenges or delays. The longitudinal nature of this study will enable the capture of the evolving and nuanced anticipations and perceptions towards AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project environments using PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies.
Data collection for this research will be comprehensive, utilizing multiple sources to gather in-depth information relevant to the research questions and objectives. This mixed-methods approach ensures a broad understanding of the subject matter and supports triangulation of findings for robust conclusions.
Primary information will be collected by conducting surveys with project management practitioners. The primary data will provide critical insights directly from professionals working within project management, particularly those with experience in PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodologies, and AI tools.
1. Surveys: Surveys will be designed to collect quantitative and qualitative data from practitioners of PMBOK, PRINCE2, and Agile methodologies. Survey questions will be tailored to understand practitioners' perceptions and expectations regarding AI-enhanced risk management within Agile environments. Specifically, it will focus on capturing the perceived effectiveness, challenges, and comparative appeal of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies when integrating AI tools in risk management. The survey will be administered online to allow for broad reach and convenience of participation.
Secondary data collection will involve a thorough examination of existing literature, including academic articles, industry reports, case studies, and white papers. The secondary data will provide context and background knowledge on the themes of the study.
1. Literature on PMBOK, PRINCE2, and Agile Methodologies: Books, academic articles, and official guidelines related to these methodologies will be reviewed to understand their fundamental principles, processes, and techniques, especially concerning risk management.
2. Literature on AI in Risk Management: Academic articles, technology reports, and case studies exploring the use of AI tools in risk management will be analyzed. This will provide insights into the current state of AI in risk management and its potential applications within Agile project management.
3. Comparative Studies: Studies comparing PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, with a focus on risk management and AI integration, will be reviewed. This will help understand the relative strengths, weaknesses, and unique aspects of these methodologies in the context of Agile environments.
The data collected will then undergo rigorous analysis to answer the research questions and achieve the research objectives. The diverse sources and mixed-methods approach will contribute to the robustness and reliability of the research findings.
The data analysis process is the next critical step following data collection. This process will be tailored according to the type of data gathered and the research questions and objectives. It will involve both quantitative and qualitative methods to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand.
The bulk of the data will be collected through surveys, which will include responses to Likert scale questions and other numerical information. This data will be analyzed using statistical software, such as SPSS or Excel. Descriptive statistics will summarize the data, while inferential statistics will examine potential relationships between variables. Techniques such as t-tests, chi-square tests, or correlation analyses might be used to compare group means or examine relationships between variables.
The quantitative analysis will provide a general understanding of project management practitioners' perceptions of the effectiveness of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies when integrated into Agile environments. It will also give an overview of the expectations and perceived challenges regarding the incorporation of AI tools in risk management within these methodologies.
Qualitative data will primarily be gathered through open-ended survey questions. This data will undergo a thematic analysis, a method for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) within the data. The analysis will follow a six-phase process outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006), involving familiarizing with the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the report.
This analysis will provide deeper insights into project management practitioners' comparative perceptions of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies for incorporating AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project environments.
To enhance the validity and reliability of the research findings, data triangulation will be carried out. This process will cross-check and confirm the results obtained from the quantitative and qualitative analyses, ensuring the conclusions are well-founded and robust.
In the following chapter, these data analysis techniques will be applied to the collected data, providing valuable insights into the perceptions, anticipations, and comparisons of PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodologies, and AI-enhanced risk management.
The execution of this research will strictly observe robust ethical principles to protect the rights, privacy, and interests of all stakeholders. The following guidelines will ensure ethical research practices:
Respecting Intellectual Property Rights
All data, information, or sources of knowledge used in this research will be properly acknowledged. Any form of plagiarism will be strictly avoided. Proper citations will be given for all direct quotes, paraphrases, or ideas borrowed from other works.
Confidentiality in Data Handling
The research may require access to sensitive information about PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodologies, and AI technologies. We will uphold the highest level of confidentiality while handling such information. Any collected data or derived insights will be securely stored and solely used for the specific purpose of this study.
Disclosure and Consent
If the research involves stakeholders, experts, or practitioners, they will be given complete information about the research's purpose, process, and potential implications. Their informed consent will be obtained before involving them in interviews or surveys.
Avoiding Bias
To maintain the integrity of the research, an objective analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, Agile project environments, and AI-enhanced risk management will be ensured. Any potential biases toward a specific methodology or tool will be consciously avoided.
Adherence to Regulatory Standards
This study will comply with all relevant institutional, regional, and national ethical guidelines for conducting research. This is particularly crucial when dealing with the inclusion of AI tools and technologies in project management methodologies.
By strictly adhering to these ethical guidelines, this study aims to uphold the highest standards of integrity, objectivity, and respect for all intellectual property. Adhering to this ethical stance will also enhance the credibility and reliability of the research findings.
This research has been meticulously designed to effectively address its objectives. However, potential limitations associated with the chosen methodology and scope should be acknowledged. These limitations include:
Data Availability
While AI tools are becoming more commonplace in project management, comprehensive case studies or real-world examples illustrating their application within the PMBOK, PRINCE2, and Agile methodologies, especially regarding risk management, may be limited. More publicly available, detailed data could be beneficial for a more in-depth analysis.
Diversity in Implementation
PMBOK, PRINCE2, and Agile methodologies, along with the integration of AI in risk management, are applied differently across various organizations and projects. As such, the findings of this research, though informative, may not be universally applicable across all contexts.
Subjective Perceptions and Anticipations
This research heavily relies on the subjective perceptions and anticipations of project management practitioners regarding AI-enhanced risk management within Agile environments. These perceptions might be influenced by individual experiences, bias, or misinformation, which could introduce variability in the research findings.
Complexity of AI Tools
AI tools and their role in risk management are complex and continually evolving. Keeping up with the pace of advancement and accurately understanding and measuring the effectiveness of these tools within the context of the PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies can pose challenges.
Time Constraints
Given the research's specific timeframe, the scope of the investigation and the number of practitioners engaged in the study may be limited. Additionally, rapid technological advancements in AI and changes in project management practices may lead to certain aspects of the research becoming outdated quickly.
Understanding these limitations is critical as they provide context to the findings and help frame the conclusions of this research. Despite these constraints, this study aims to provide valuable insights and contribute to the growing body of knowledge on AI-enhanced risk management within Agile project environments using PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies.
This chapter has set forth the research methodology for this study, which aims to explore the perceptions and anticipations of project management practitioners towards AI-enhanced risk management in Agile project management environments. A particular focus will be a comparative analysis between the PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies in relation to the integration of these AI tools. The study employs both qualitative and quantitative research methods to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
The qualitative data gathered will help elucidate the intricate dynamics between PMBOK, PRINCE2, Agile methodologies, and AI tools, and the perceptions of practitioners regarding these interactions. On the other hand, the quantitative data will provide empirical insights into the practitioners' anticipations, perceived challenges, and the comparative appeal of PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies when considering AI-enhanced risk management in Agile environments.
Information will be collected via surveys, which will include both rating scales for quantitative data and open-ended questions for qualitative insights. Moreover, secondary data will be referred to from academic journals, industry reports, and case studies. Qualitative data will be analyzed thematically, while quantitative data will undergo statistical analysis. Throughout the research process, we will strictly adhere to ethical considerations, including ensuring the anonymity and confidentiality of all participants.
The chapter also acknowledges potential limitations of the study, such as the possible lack of comprehensive case studies demonstrating the implementation of AI in risk management within PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies, as well as the diversity in the application of these methodologies across various contexts.
Despite these limitations, the proposed research design and methodological approach offer a robust framework for addressing the research objectives and answering the research questions. The methodology outlined provides a comprehensive approach to understanding the research problem and aims to offer valuable insights into the potential for AI to improve risk management within Agile project environments, using PMBOK and PRINCE2 methodologies as benchmarks. The next chapter will present the findings from this research.
(Sections will depend on your specific data and analysis)
(Sections will depend on your results and their implications)
(This report includes a summary of the research, the key findings, potential implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research.)
Albadarneh, A., Albadarneh, I., & Qusef, A., 2015. Risk Management in Agile Software Development: A Comparative Study. IEEE.
Association for Computing Machinery, 2020. Agile Project Management Challenges and Mapping Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review. [online] Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3378936.3378949 [Accessed 18 June 2023].
AXELOS, (2015). Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2. The Stationery Office.
AXELOS, (2015). PRINCE2 Agile. The Stationery Office.
Belharet, A., Bharathan, U., Dzingina, B., Madhavan, N., Mathur2, C., & Toti, Y.-D. B., 2020. Report on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Project Management. ESIEE Paris. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3660689. Accessed 18 June 2023.
Benaben, F., Lauras, M., Montreuil, B., Faugère, L., Gou, J., & Mu, W., 2019. Physics of Organization Dynamics: An AI Framework for Opportunity and Risk Management. IEEE.
Fitsilis, P., (2008). Comparing PMBOK and Agile Project Management Software Development Processes. Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering. Available at: [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_68] (Accessed: 18 June 2023).
Ghosh, S., Forrest, D., & DiNetta, T., (2015). Enhance PMBOK® by Comparing it with P2M, ICB, PRINCE2, APM, and Scrum Project Management Standards—PM World Journal.
Giudici, P. (2018). 'Fintech Risk Management: A Research Challenge for Artificial Intelligence in Finance,’ Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), p. 1–5. doi: 10.3389/frai.2018.00001.
Giudici, P., Raffinetti, E., 2021. 'Artificial intelligence (AI) methods in cyber risk management.’ Qual Reliab Engng Int, DOI: 10.1002/qre.2939.
Jamali, G., & Oveisi, M., 2016. 'A Study on Project Management Based on PMBOK and PRINCE2', Modern Applied Science, 10(6), p.142. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/mas.v10n6p142 (Accessed: Date accessed).
Karaman, E., & Kurt, M., 2015. Comparison of project management methodologies: Prince two versus PMBOK for IT projects. Int. Journal of Applied Sciences and Engineering Research, 10.6088.ijaser.04059.
Lee, O.-K. D., & Baby, D. V., 2013. Managing Dynamic Risks in Global IT Projects: Agile Risk-Management Using the Principles of Service-Oriented Architecture. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622013400117.
Martínez, D.M. and Fernández-Rodríguez, J.C., 2015. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Project Success: A Literature Review. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial
Tucnik, P., Otcenaskova, T. & Horalek, J. (2023) Project and Risk Management in the Context of IT Projects, Hradec Economic Days, doi: 10.36689/uhk/hed/2023-01-071
Kutsch, E., 2023. Through a glass darkly. [online] Available at: https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/19551 [Accessed 8 July 2023].
Kusrini, E., Praditya, T. A., & Wahyudi, B. (2023). Risk Maturity Model: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Manila, Philippines, March 7-9. Retrieved from https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2023manila/368.pdf.
Zhang, D. (2022). Understanding Enterprise Risk Management of the Retail Industry During the Pandemic-Case Study of Walmart. SHS Web of Conferences, 154, 01018. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315401018
Tucnik, P., Otcenaskova, T., and Horalek, J. (2023) 'Project and Risk Management in the Context of IT Projects', Hradec Economic Days, doi: 10.36689/uhk/hed/2023-01-071
Tomanek, M. and Juricek, J., 2015. 'Project Risk Management Model Based on PRINCE2 and Scrum Frameworks'. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), [online] Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2015.6107 [Accessed 8 Jul. 2023]
Williams, R. T. (2023) 'Software Project Management'. [Online] Available at: https://osf.io/82vq3/ (Accessed: 8 July 2023)
Reunamaki, R., & Fey, C.F. (2023). Remote agile: Problems, solutions, and pitfalls to avoid. Business Horizons, 66(5), 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.10.003
Rasool, N., Yousaf, S., Haseeb, U., Ahmad, S.Z., Iqbal, M.W., & Hamid, K. (2023). SCRUM AND THE AGILE PROCEDURE'S IMPACT ON SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MQW9P
Guerrero-Ulloa, G., Rodríguez-Domínguez, C. & Hornos, M. J. (2023). Agile Methodologies Applied to the Development of Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Systems: A Review. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020790
Mihelič, A., Vrhovec, S., & Hovelja, T. (2023). Agile Development of Secure Software for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. MDPI, [online] Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010801 [Accessed 7 Jul. 2023]
Martin, A., 2023. Introduction to an agile framework for the management of technology transfer projects. Procedia Computer Science, [e-journal] 219, pp.1963-1968. Available through: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.496 [Accessed 7 July 2023]
Amaro, F., & Domingues, L. (2022). PMBOK 6th meets 7th: How to link both guides in order to support project tailoring? ScienceDirect. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050923004982 [Accessed 8 Jul. 2023].
Kunya, I. O. & Yusuf, M. (2023). Risk Management Practices and Performance of Renewable Energy Projects in Nairobi County. World Journal of Innovative Research, 14(4), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.31871/WJIR.14.4.14
Davidov, P., Ainbinder, I., Ayoubi, N., Avivi, B., and Eliyahu, L. (2023) 'Implementation of Project Management Knowledge Areas by Project Managers', Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 13(3), pp. 138-143. doi: 10.32738/JEPPM.2023.0014.
Rehacek, P. (2017) 'Risk management standards for project management', International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, Available at: http://www.science-gate.com/IJAAS.html [Accessed 8 Jul. 2023]
Davidov, P., Ainbinder, I., Ayoubi, N., Avivi, B., & Eliyahu, L. (2023). Implementation of Project Management Knowledge Areas by Project Managers. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, doi: 10.32738/JEPPM.2023.0014
Soravito, G. (2023) 'Artificial Intelligence for Risk Management: A Systematic Review', Politecnico di Torino, Available at: http://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/id/eprint/26383 (Accessed: 8 July 2023)
Mishra, A., Tripathi, A., & Khazanchi, D. (2023). A Proposal for Research on the Application of AI/ML in ITPM: Intelligent Project Management. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, 14(1). doi:10.4018/IJITPM.315290
Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C., Gounopoulos, D., Platanakis, E., & Zhangc, W. (2022). Operational research and artificial intelligence methods in banking. ScienceDirect. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.04.027 (Accessed: 7 July 2023)
Dwivedi, Y.K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E.L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A.K., Baabdullah, A.M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M.A., Al-Busaidi, A.S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., Carter, L., Chowdhury, S., Crick, T., Cunningham, S.W., Davies, G.H., Davison, R.M., D´e, R., Dennehy, D., Duan, Y., Dubey, R., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J.S., Flavia´n, C., Gauld, R., Grover, V., Hu, M.C., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Junglas, I., Khorana, S., Kraus, S., Larsen, K.R., Latreille, P., Laumer, S., Malik, F.T., Mardani, A., Mariani, M., Mithas, S., Mogaji, E., Nord, J.H., O’Connor, S., Okumus, F., Pagani, M., Pandey, N., Papagiannidis, S., Pappas, I.O., Pathak, N., Pries-Heje, J., Raman, R., Rana, N.P., Rehm, S.V., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Richter, A., Rowe, F., Sarker, S., Stahl, B.C., Tiwari, M.K., van der Aalst, W., Venkatesh, V., Viglia, G., Wade, M., Walton, P., Wirtz, J., Wright, R., 2023. Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Schuett, J., Reuel, A., & Carlier, A. (2023). How to design an AI ethics board. ArXiv. /abs/2304.07249. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07249
Hacker, P., Engel, A., & Mauer, M. (2023). Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models. In ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594067
Papagiannidis, E., Enholm1, I. M., Dremel1, C., Mikalef1, P., Krogstie1, J. (2022) Toward AI Governance: Identifying Best Practices and Potential Barriers and Outcomes, Information Systems Frontiers, 25, pp.123–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10251-y
Fotso, G. B., Pradhan, A., & Sukdeo, N. (2022). Importance of Artificial Intelligence in Technology Project Management. Proceedings of the First Australian International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 1337-1342. Retrieved from https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022australia/302.pdf
Dodd, S. and Wang, Y., 2012. 'Prince2 and Entrepreneurship: Risk Taking & Risk Management in Two Micro-Sized Restaurants'. Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), [online] Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/ukais2012/14 [Accessed 7 July 2023]
Mousaei, M. and Gandomani, T.J., 2018. 'A New Project Risk Management Model based on Scrum Framework and Prince2 Methodology', International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 9(4). doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090461
Morjane, W., Bannari, R., & Gharib, J. (2022). Overview of Project Management Methodologies: Traditional Versus Agile Approach. Proceedings of the 5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Retrieved from https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022rome/157.pdf
Leong, J., Yee, K.M., Baitsegi, O., Palanisamy, L., & Ramasamy, R.K. (2023). Hybrid Project Management between Traditional Software Development Lifecycle and Agile Based Product Development for Future Sustainability. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021121
Comments